Elastic

Observed sample — we report what we actually see. 1 tracked postings (1 currently listed) on greenhouse; durations and relist counts are what our tracking observed, not a market claim. Most postings don't show a confidence score yet: tracking only started recently, and a score needs history. Every tracked posting is re-checked every few hours, so scores populate as that history builds.

Company careers page ↗

Greenhouse · listed 42 days

Looks real. Worth applying — no ghost signals observed.

Confidence score

100

of 100

100of 100
How this score was built

Relist cycles

None observed

0 of 50

No take-down-and-relist cycle observed for this posting.

Listing age

Listed 42 days

0 of 30

First seen less than 90 days ago — outside the staleness window, so no deduction.

Board spread

Seen on 1 board (greenhouse)

0 of 20

Seen on a single board — no spread signal.

Duplicate URLs

1 URL for this role

0 of 20

No duplicate URLs observed.

Pay listed

Not stated in the listing data we read

0 of 5

No pay is stated in the listing data we read. That's common and honest — it neither helps nor hurts this score (a real role can still omit pay).

Pay across listings

No listing states pay — nothing to compare

0 of 15

No listing states pay, so there's nothing to compare — missing pay is never counted as a conflict.

Observation window

Watched 130035 times over 42 days

context

At least 7 checks over at least 14 days — a confident read.

Observed sample — these are posting facts we actually saw, not judgments. Confidence scores are computed from what we observe — 0-100, higher = more confidence the posting is real and active. Everything we track is public here — scores, histories and the reasons behind them. Company-level analytics aren't for sale right now.

Check any posting — first 5 checks free →